Gold and Silver’s Pre-Market Rally

tools spotlight

Briefly: In our opinion, full (150% of the regular full position) speculative short positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective at the moment of publishing this alert.

Yesterday’s session was quite volatile on an intra-day basis, but in the end, nothing really changed. The only thing that’s worth commenting on regarding yesterday’s session is silver’s small outperformance. Gold and miners didn’t close higher, but silver did – not significantly, but still. This outperformance seems to be present also today as silver moved higher in today’s pre-market trading. Gold moved higher as well, but silver’s $0.35 upswing is more visible. What are the implications?

In short, silver’s performance is not bullish as it’s very short-term strength is something that we often see before sizable declines. There’s also a good reason for the precious metals market to rally and it’s the escalation of tensions regarding North Korea and indications that the regime’s nuclear potential is more advanced than previously considered along with Donald Trump’s reaction to North Korean threats. He said that additional threats from North Korea “will be met with fire and fury”.

This appears to be a very serious declaration. Regardless of whether it will be fulfilled or not, the precious metals market should react strongly to it (not to mention the reaction to the nuclear revelations). Instead, at the moment of writing these words, gold is a mere $13 higher. This weak reaction is – despite the fact that rallies are usually viewed as bullish – actually quite bearish. If escalating nuclear tensions are not enough to trigger a reasonable rally in gold, then what can? In this situation, we can expect that once the tensions subside gold will slide lower once again, giving up today’s pre-market rally and then declining a lot more based on the medium-term trend. In fact, there were multiple cases that proved that gold’s reactions to geopolitical risks are very often short-lived.

Summing up, it doesn’t seem that we should be concerned with today’s pre-market upswing as the size of the rally is much smaller than one would expect it to be based on increasing nuclear tensions. Moreover, silver’s short-term outperformance is something that we often see before big declines, so it serves as a bearish / neutral sign, not a bullish one.

As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – informed.

To summarize:

Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Short positions (150% of the full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial target price levels / profit-take orders:

Gold: initial target price level: $1,063; stop-loss: $1,317; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $81.88; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $44.57
Silver: initial target price: $13.12; stop-loss: $19.22; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $46.18; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $17.93
Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $9.34; stop-loss: $26.34; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $143.56; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $21.37

In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:

GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $14.13; stop-loss: $45.31
JDST ETF: initial target price: $417.04; stop-loss: $43.12

Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)

Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position

Important Details for New Subscribers

Whether you already subscribed or not, we encourage you to find out how to make the most of our alerts and read our replies to the most common alert-and-gold-trading-related-questions.

Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).

Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.

Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.

As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.

Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.

Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.

As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.

=====

Latest Free Trading Alerts:

Tensions with North Korea are rising. What does it imply for the gold market?

Rising Tensions with North Korea and Gold

=====

Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:

PRECIOUS-Gold gains on escalating North Korea tensions

A Canadian company wants to help artisanal miners produce “clean gold”

=====

In other news:

Havens Jump on North Korea Tension; Stocks Slide: Markets Wrap

Global markets wobble after Trump warns North Korea of 'fire and fury'