Briefly: in our opinion, full (250% of the regular size of the position) speculative short position in gold, silver, and mining stocks is justified from the risk/reward perspective at the moment of publishing this Alert.
After gold’s plunge on Thursday, it made a comeback attempt on Friday. But that erased only half of Thursday’s vigorous decline. The situation in silver and gold miners doesn’t provide much ground for optimism either. The silent scream we wrote about in the Wednesday’s Alert brought serious repercussions. Both immediately and step-by-step as in a trainwreck in slow motion. Either way you look at it, just in time. Today, gold is striving to build on Friday’s gains. How much longer can this last?
In Thursday’s extensive Alert, we let you know that today’s Alerts is going to be rather short as we provided update on more long-term oriented factors well in advance. We also provided you with a quick update on Friday regarding the very short-term moves. Since we posted Friday’s issue, the precious metals prices have not moved significantly (silver was trading at $15.33 and it’s trading at $15.30 at the moment of writing these words) and thus what we wrote on Friday, especially about silver, remains up-to-date.
There are, however, 2 markets that we would like to discuss: the mining stocks and the USD Index, which means that today’s Alert will not be so short after all.
Let’s start with the former.
Gold Miners: Corroborating Evidence
The thing is that gold miners should have rallied given gold’s upswing and they didn’t. The HUI Index even declined a bit. The size of the decline is not important – the lack of rally given gold’s $7 upswing is. This is a bearish sign and – more importantly – a factor that clearly differentiates the current situation from the late-January performance.
On March 7, when the HUI was right after the move to new monthly lows, we wrote the following:
The HUI also closed below the declining medium-term support/resistance line, which appears to be a major development. But…
Despite all the extremely bearish signs for the following months, we are still skeptical about the very short-term price moves. You see, we saw almost exactly the same thing recently. In mid-January, gold miners closed a bit above the 50-day moving average after a volatile decline. Then they paused for 2 days and then declined below the 50-day MA. That seemed to be a beginning of another move lower, but it actually turned out to be a local bottom. That was also the time when we saw a small move lower below the declining red support/resistance line that we see on the above chart.
Consequently, while the medium term is clearly and extremely bearish, the next several days could still see higher prices. We don’t expect any major move up – definitely not above the recent highs – but a comeback to the early February highs in the miners might still be in the cards.
The HUI Index moved a bit above the early February highs, but – what is much more important - it didn’t move above the mid-February highs. The move above the February highs, however, might have caused concerns about the bearish nature of the move. After all, the move was quite sizable on a very short-term basis. The subsequent decline might have appeared as a quick correction within a rally that didn’t change much.
The important thing about Friday’s performance is that it was a second day when the miners declined, which was also a weekly close which partially confirms that the move lower was more than a correction within an upswing. The fact that miners just refused to move higher despite gold’s and silver’s upswing is a clear confirmation that in fact it was the recent upswing that was a correction by itself and the downswing was a return to normalcy, not the other way around. It may seem odd that a session, when miners have done anything in terms of the closing prices was so meaningful, but that actually was the case.
The second factor that confirms the bearish nature of the recent moves in the PMs is the situation in the USD Index.
The USD Index: Worthy of Attention
The USDX had previously moved to our target area and then just declined a little bit more. That’s not a serious breakdown as there are strong support levels just below and the above doesn’t change a lot for the USD itself. It was yet another higher low that fits the overall bullish picture for the medium term.
We see more interesting implications in case of the gold-USD link. The USDX is currently close to its recent lows, but gold is not even close to its early recent highs. Gold topped at $1345 in late February and its currently trading about $40 lower. This clearly shows the medium-term underperformance of gold and serves as a confirmation that the several-month-long corrective upswing in the precious metals market has come to an end. Actually, the big decline in the PMs is likely already underway.
Summary
Summing up, it’s almost certain that the next big move lower has already begun and that the 2013-like slide is in its early stage. Based on the updated version of the 2013-now link, the implications are even more bearish than we had initially assumed. The downside target for gold remains intact ($890), and the corrective upswing that we just saw seems to be rather natural part of the bigger move lower – not a beginning of an important move higher. And it seems that the corrective move higher in the PMs is either over or about to be over shortly.
To summarize:
Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full short position (250% of the full position) in gold, silver, and mining stocks is justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and exit profit-take price levels:
- Gold: profit-take exit price: $1,062; stop-loss: $1,357; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $82.96; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $39.87
- Silver: profit-take exit price: $12.32; stop-loss: $16.44; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $47.67; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $23.68
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): profit-take exit price: $13.12; stop-loss: $24.17; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $76.87; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $15.47
Note: the above is a specific preparation for a possible sudden price drop, it does not reflect the most likely outcome. You will find a more detailed explanation in our August 1st Alert. In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks’ prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: profit-take exit price: $17.52; stop-loss: $35.67
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $143.87 stop-loss: $30.97
Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)
Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position
Important Details for New Subscribers
Whether you already subscribed or not, we encourage you to find out how to make the most of our alerts and read our replies to the most common alert-and-gold-trading-related-questions.
Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
Stocks extended their short-term uptrend on Friday, as investors' sentiment remained bullish following the recent advances. The S&P 500 index was the highest since the early October. But will the rally continue despite some short-term technical overbought conditions?
Stocks Higher but Still Close to Their Previous Highs
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
