gold trading, silver trading - daily alerts

przemyslaw-radomski

Gold, Silver and Their Lack of Rebound Yesterday

September 12, 2019, 6:28 AM Przemysław Radomski , CFA

Briefly: in our opinion, full (250% of the regular size of the position) speculative short position in gold, silver, and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view at the moment of publishing this Alert.

Did you see that yesterday's precious metals upswing? Were you impressed with the veracity of the rebound? One may say that this is a baby step in the right direction but wouldn't be a more pronounced bullish shift appropriate? But if you look at the USD Index, yesterday's PMs session makes perfect sense.

In yesterday's Alert, we wrote that the precious metals sector could bounce based on the support level that was reached but that this bounce would likely not be significant. We saw exactly that. Gold, silver, and mining stocks moved higher, but insignificantly so. In fact, the move was even smaller than we expected it to be. While this may mean that the upswing is not over yet, it may also very well be at its end.

Why? Because of what happened in the USD Index and because of the shape of yesterday's sessions and the price levels that were reached. Let's take a look at the latter.

Yesterday's PMs Upswing. What Upswing?

Yesterday, we wrote the following on the above chart:

Gold close - and thus broke - below the $1,500 level yesterday. The breakdown was small - less than $1, so the move is definitely not confirmed. At the same time, gold moved to the rising support line but failed to close below it. This support is likely to trigger a rebound and that's what we're seeing in today's trading. So far gold is up by about $7 and we don't expect the rally to be much bigger than that. Gold's seasonals don't point to strength at this time and there are multiple other factors that instead point to the decline's continuation.

For instance, gold miners just confirmed the breakdown below their rising support line. They also managed to close yesterday's session below July highs. This is bearish on its own and also through the relationship with gold. Gold miners' weakness relative to gold tends to herald weakness in the entire precious metals sector.

Does silver's pause indicate any strength here? No. It declined sharply, so a daily breather is very natural, and it doesn't imply anything.

Gold futures closed yesterday's session back above $1,500, invalidating the tiny breakdown. At the same time, spot gold price confirmed the breakdown below this level. The implications of both developments are rather unclear. What is clear however, is that in case of the intraday price movement, gold broke below the rising support line and is now verifying the breakdown below it. Yesterday's upswing could only take the price back to the previously broken support line. Nothing more. This line remains unbroken in the overnight trading as well. This means that the outlook deteriorated.

The session in silver was the third breather in a row, which is not that surprising given that silver's decline this month was the most volatile one.

Gold miners moved higher more visibly, almost reaching Friday's closing price, but they gave away most of their gains before the session was over. This is important, because it shows that whatever strength the bulls might have had, they were overpowered by the bears. Consequently, there might not be more to this small upswing than those several hours of strength of yesterday.

The additional confirmation comes from the USD Index.

The USD Index Keeps Rising Back

The USDX invalidated the breakdown below the rising support line, opening way to further strength in the upcoming days. The strength in the USD Index means that it's likely to make another attempt to break above the rising green line, which may be successful this time. The confirmed breakout above it would complete the inverse head-and-shoulders pattern, which would then likely trigger a move to about 102. That's quite a sizable rally from the current levels and the precious metals market is likely to react to it in a big way.

And what if the USDX doesn't manage to break above the green line and declines again? Then PMs are not likely to do much anyway, simply because they are already in the decline mode. They proved this by declining recently without USD's help in the previous week.

There's not much more that we can add to today's analysis, simply because nothing really happened yesterday, so the moves in the important ratios are negligible and the changes to the long-term charts offer even less to talk of.

However, before summarizing, we would like to once again quote the section with links to most important bearish factors that are currently in play:

Key Factors to Keep in Mind

Critical factors:

Very important, but not as critical factors:

Important factors:

Moreover, please note that while there may be a recession threat, it doesn't mean that gold has to rally immediately. Both: recession and gold's multi-year rally could be many months away - comparing what happened to bond yields in the 90s confirms that.

In particular, it's worth keeping in mind the enormous potential of the USD Index. It's after a major breakout in 2014/2015 and three verifications thereof. The 2017-2018 decline which seems huge on its own, was just a verification of a much bigger (and thus more important) pattern.

Summary

Summing up, the big decline in the precious metals sector appears to be finally underway as gold and silver are plunging even without a rallying USD Index. And the PMs' decline started right after the U.S. Labor Day, as we have described. Once the USDX takes off, it will likely serve as fuel to the fire-like decline that's already underway. The similarity to mid-90s continues to support much lower gold prices in the following months, and the True Seasonal patterns continues to favor lower gold prices in the following weeks. All in all, it seems that what we see right now is the beginning of the final stage of the prolonged decline in the precious metals sector that started in 2011. On a short-term basis, it seems that we might get some temporary strength once gold moves to about $1,330 - perhaps within the next few weeks.

As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - informed.

To summarize:

Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full speculative short position (250% of the full position) in gold, silver, and mining stocks is justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and exit profit-take price levels:

  • Gold: profit-take exit price: $1,332; stop-loss: $1,583; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $39.87; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN: $25.17
  • Silver: profit-take exit price: $14,62; stop-loss: $20,16; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $32.96; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN: $11.67
  • Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): profit-take exit price: $22.62; stop-loss: $32.37; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $17.28; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $5.48

In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so - we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades - if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and target prices:

  • GDXJ ETF: profit-take exit price: $30.32; stop-loss: $45.42
  • JDST ETF: profit-take exit price: $38.36 stop-loss: $11.26

Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)

Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position

Whether you already subscribed or not, we encourage you to find out how to make the most of our alerts and read our replies to the most common alert-and-gold-trading-related-questions.

Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).

Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.

Please note that a full position doesn't mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.

As a reminder - "initial target price" means exactly that - an "initial" one, it's not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we've done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not "initial", but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.

Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks - the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as "final". This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the "additional instruments" (DGLD for instance), but not for the "main instrument" (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn't, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it's not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can't provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the "additional instruments" without adjusting the levels in the "main instruments", which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.

Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.

As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.

=====

Latest Free Trading Alerts:

The Fed cut the interest rates at the end of July. As the previous easing cycle started in September 2007, many analysts are saying that the current year looks more and more like 2007. We invite you to read our today's article that compares the current year with 2007 and find out what are the implications for the gold market.

Is 2019 Similar to 2007? What Does It Mean For Gold?

=====

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager

Did you enjoy the article? Share it with the others!

Gold Alerts

More
menu subelement hover background