Briefly: In our opinion, speculative short positions (full) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view.
Today’s alert is going to be short because nothing really happened in the precious metals market – we saw a pause, which didn’t change the previous trends and all that we wrote yesterday remains up-to-date.
One thing that we would like to show you, though, is the size of the volume in gold (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).
The volume was very small, which suggests that the next big move will be to the downside and that yesterday’s upswing was only a correction within a decline.
As far as today’s pre-market action is concerned, the implications are also bearish because gold and silver are not showing strength despite a move a bit lower in the USD Index.
All in all, since nothing changed, we can summarize today’s alert just like we summarized yesterday’s issue:
Summing up, silver is likely to move much higher in the coming years and so do gold and mining stocks, however, it seems likely that we will see another big decline before seeing much higher prices. Last week’s reversals and silver, gold, mining stocks and the USD Index suggest that the decline is already underway, even though we can’t rule out another temporary move higher.
Consequently, we think that a short position (full) in gold, silver and mining stocks is justified from the risk to reward point of view. It’s rather unclear, but it seems that the decline should start within the next several days and the decline could remain in place for a few months (no market moves in a straight line and there will be corrections, though).
As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – updated.
To summarize:
Trading capital (our opinion): Short positions (full) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial target price levels:
- Gold: initial target price: $973; stop-loss: $1,304, initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $89.05; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $47.15
- Silver: initial target price: $12.13; stop-loss: $18.05, initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $61.16; stop-loss for DSLV ETN $26.80
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $9.34; stop-loss: $24.07, initial target price for the DUST ETF: $5.72; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $1.74
In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $14.13; stop-loss: $36.37
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $8.86; stop-loss: $2.27
Long-term capital (our opinion): No positions
Insurance capital (our opinion): Full position
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the sings pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.
The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
The velocity of money is declining. What does it mean for the gold market?
Although U.S. dollar moved sharply higher against the yen on Friday (after news that the Bank of Japan could expand the negative interest rate policy), yesterday’s weak U.S. housing sector data (which showed that new home sales declined by 1.5% in the previous month) triggered a reversal and USD/JPY dropped to the first Fibonacci retracement. Will we see further deterioration in the coming days?
Forex Trading Alert: Will USD/JPY Decline Any Further?
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
ICBC Standard Bank: Taking Money Off the Table
Venezuela Sends More Gold to Switzerland; $2.2B in 1Q
Hedge funds aren't wavering on gold price rally
=====
In other news:
The Fed Is Meeting in April to Talk About June
U.S. workforce growth may give Fed one more reason to go slow on rates
4 Reasons The Fed Won't Raise Rates (And Why it Might)
Greece Faces New IMF Curve Ball to Unlock Aid: Scenarios
Cash is flooding into emerging markets
New-home sales plunge in the West
Negative Rate Surprises Abound as Danish Investments Stall
Goldman Says China's Iron Speculation ‘Concerns Us the Most’
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts