Briefly: In our opinion small (half of the regular size) speculative long positions are currently justified from the risk/reward point of view.
Gold formed a reversal, miners showed strength and moved higher yesterday, but silver plunged – this kind of reaction in the market can say a lot. What does it say?
In yesterday’s alert we wrote the following about a possible breakdown in mining stocks:
If we get a confirmed breakdown below the above, we might re-open the short positions, but it’s more likely that we’ll see a pullback in the USD and a corrective upswing in metals and miners. Ideally, we would then like to see a move higher in metals and miners on low volume ending with daily outperformance of silver.
What we saw yesterday was the opposite of the above. We saw quick and sharp underperformance in the case of silver, outperformance in mining stocks and strength in them. We additionally have a reversal in gold and the USD is practically right at its resistance levels, and the True Seasonal patterns favor a corrective downswing in the USD and a corrective rally in metals and miners. Let’s take a closer look (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).
The USD Index rallied and closed only slightly above the April highs and formed a shooting start (reversal) candlestick. This suggests that the breakout will be invalidated shortly and that a move lower will follow.
Even more importantly, the USD encountered another resistance – the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level based on the entire December 2015 – May 2016 decline. This makes a corrective downswing quite likely from here, especially given the current seasonal tendencies for the USD Index.
How low is the USD Index likely to correct? Most likely to the 94 level – that’s where we currently have the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement (and this technique tends to work particularly well for currencies) and that’s more or less the level to which the USD declined after topping in April.
Moreover, since the USD Index had such a quick run-up this month, it’s simply natural to expect some kind of correction.
Again, we don’t think that the move lower would be anything more than just a pullback – we remain bullish on the USD Index also for the medium term.
Gold and silver both declined on significant volume yesterday after having moved higher on relatively low volume. Both markets confirm that the current big move is down. So, have we missed entering at the top? Most likely – based on the situation in the USD Index – no, but even if that is the case, the vast majority of the decline is still ahead. Moving back to the short-term outlook, metals didn’t show that they stopped responding to the USD’s signals yesterday – they declined as the USD rallied, nothing more.
Silver underperformed in a clear way yesterday, which is the opposite of the bearish confirmation that we wanted to see as a bearish confirmation – we just saw a bullish one.
Moreover, silver didn’t stop at some random level – it stopped at the October 2015 high. Consequently, we might expect a corrective bounce here.
The True Seasonal patterns for gold suggest that a short-term bottom was just formed and a second-half-of-May corrective upswing is coming. Will the gold market wait with the decline until early June? Possibly, but if we see strong bearish confirmations (like silver’s short-term outperformance) within a week or so, we will not wait until next month to re-enter the short positions.
At this time, silver’s performance and other signals point to higher prices in the short term, not lower ones.
As far as mining stocks are concerned, we wrote the following yesterday:
Miners plunged on huge volume. This is a classic bearish sign, however, based on the previous several similar days after which miners didn't decline, we view it only as a moderately bearish sign, especially that miners didn’t move below their May lows (let alone both April highs).
If we get a confirmed breakdown below the above, we might re-open the short positions, but it’s more likely that we’ll see a pullback in the USD and a corrective upswing in metals and miners.
The history repeated itself and instead of the “classic” decline, the big decline was followed by a significant reversal. Mining stocks’ strong performance is even more significant given that both gold and the general stock market finally closed lower.
The breakdown below the previous May lows was not only not confirmed – it was quickly invalidated.
There are two additional – and important – things that make us think that corrections in the USD and metals are likely to be seen.
The gold to oil ratio just broke below a very important trend channel:
Several weeks ago we featured this ratio (when it moved above the upper border of the trend channel) and we wrote that this breakout was likely to be invalidated and that it was something that indicated that the final bottom was likely still ahead. The breakout was indeed invalidated and we just saw a breakdown in the ratio. There was only one similar case to the current one – 1999.
What happened previously? Gold moved somewhat higher and after a few weeks the final decline – to the final lows – started. This scenario appears quite likely based on the signals that we have right now in other short- and long-term charts.
The second thing is the issue of a possible interest rate hike in June. This issue is quite controversial as on the same day we received 2 e-mails: one from a subscriber that was 100% sure that there would be no rate hike before the Brexit is decided, and a second one asking if we are crazy not shorting the market yet as the Fed will raise rates in June or July.
As we wrote recently, nothing really changed regarding the issue of interest rates. An interest rate hike in June is unlikely (but not impossible), but the key thing is that an increase in the rates is not required for gold to move lower, just like it was not necessary for gold to slide from $1,900 to $1,300.
Moving back to the short-term issues, people have just reacted to news (the FOMC minutes) that was released recently, but in fact, was something that reflected a past meeting – so, it was already outdated and, in light of the weak data that we saw after the meeting, the Fed’s approach could have changed. You will find more details in this article. So, what happened that was irrational in light of the above and as such, is likely to be reversed? On a short-term basis (again, this doesn’t change the main trend), it was the decline in metals that was most likely the exaggeration. Consequently, the move lower is likely to be reversed in the following days (again, the medium-term downtrend is not likely to be affected).
Summing up, we just saw the opposite of what we would like to see as a bearish confirmation and the very short-term outlook (for the next several days – possibly 1-2 weeks) became bullish. The overreaction to the FOMC minutes and technical signs from gold (reversal on significant volume), silver (strong underperformance) and mining stocks (reversal and relative strength) along with the breakdown in the gold to oil ratio favor higher prices in the short term. Consequently, we think that small speculative long positions are now justified from the risk to reward point of view.
As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – updated.
To summarize:
Trading capital (our opinion): Long positions (50% of the full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial target price levels:
- Gold: initial target price: $1,296; stop-loss: $1,238, initial target price for the UGLD ETN: $12.78; stop-loss for the UGLD ETN $11.17
- Silver: initial target price: $17.58; stop-loss: $16.23, initial target price for the USLV ETN: $18.23; stop-loss for the USLV ETN $14.46
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $26.08; stop-loss: $22.88, initial target price for the NUGT ETF: $110.91; stop-loss for the NUGT ETF $76.76
In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $39.60; stop-loss: $34.23
- JNUG ETF: initial target price: $175.32; stop-loss: $114.24
Long-term capital (our opinion): No positions
Insurance capital (our opinion): Full position
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the sings pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.
The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
The gold standard has been making headlines recently. What does it mean for the gold market?
Have you heard about the gold swap rates? We invite to read our today’s article about the gold forward offered rate and find out what is the relationship between this interest rate and the price of gold.
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
Risks mount for gold producers over deep capex cuts
Harvard, IMF economist: Emerging markets must go for gold
Gold Takes ‘Brunt of the Selling’ as Fed Primes Markets for Hike
=====
In other news:
2 things everybody missed in the Fed’s latest release
JPM: Honestly, if the economy keeps this up, it won't matter what the Fed does
El-Erian: This simple 2-part framework helps explain bouts of market volatility
Japan April core CPI seen falling for second month on energy prices
Hedge funds are racing out of the stock market
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts
