Briefly: In our opinion, full (150% of the regular full position) speculative short positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective. This position was originally featured on Jan. 12, 2017 at 3:49PM.
The USD Index moved a bit lower yesterday and even this didn’t make gold and silver rally. Conversely, both declined below their respective 50-day moving averages. How much further can metals go before the decline is over?
It’s possible that they could move quite far before any significant (!) upswing is seen. We previously discussed that both metals could rebound from their 61.8% Fibonacci retracement levels and the late January 2017 low and we wrote that we’d be monitoring the market for bullish and bearish confirmations. If we see bullish ones, we’ll consider temporarily closing speculative short positions.
However, for now, we saw an important bearish sign. Gold and silver had good reasons to rally today (hitting the support levels plus a declining USD) – and yet they didn’t. It is a strong indication that the decline is far from being over. In a way, this contradicts the signal from the mining stocks, which have been holding up relatively well in the past 3 days. The underperformance of metals vs. the USD Index is a new short-term phenomenon, so we can say that based on yesterday’s price action, the outlook for the precious metals sector deteriorated.
Let’s take a look at the charts (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).
So, will metals stop at their 61.8% Fibonacci retracements? At this time, it seems rather unlikely, but we are keeping our eyes opened for new signs of strength.
The USD Index declined a bit yesterday, but it remains visibly above the rising short-term support line and the trends remains up: the short-, medium-, and long-term ones. The implications for the precious metals sector are bearish, with the only “danger” (risk of a temporary rally) being the turning point which is still several days away.
Summing up, based on yesterday’s weakness in gold and silver relative to the USD Index and points that we made earlier this week, it appears that the outlook for the precious metals market remains bearish. We might have an opportunity to temporarily exit the speculative short position in the following days, but it’s too early to say that this will indeed be the case.
As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – informed.
To summarize:
Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Short positions (150% of the full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial target price levels / profit-take orders:
- Gold: exit-profit-take level: $1,063; stop-loss: $1,273; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $81.88; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $48.17
- Silver: initial target price: $13.12; stop-loss: $18.67; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $46.18; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $19.87
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $9.34; stop-loss: $26.34; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $143.56; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $21.37
In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $14.13; stop-loss: $45.31
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $104.26; stop-loss: $10.78
Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)
Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position
Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.
The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
Yesterday, the European Central Bank released its most recent monetary policy statement. What does it imply for the gold market?
From the fundamental point of view, one of the most important reasons for gold’s strength at the beginning of 2017 was uncertainty about Trump’s policies. We invite you to read our today’s article about the first month of the Trump’s presidency and find out how the new administration is likely to affect the gold market.
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
Gold's Dismal Week Has Investors Asking What's After March Hike
Bets on gold hold ground even as Fed rate hike looms large
Bank of America Sees a $1,400 Target for Gold
India Braces for Ban on Large Cash Deals
Global Platinum deficit may narrow to 120,000 ounces during 2017
Dieselgate hasn't hurt platinum price
=====
In other news:
Stocks Gain as U.S. Debt Nears Worst Run Since '74: Markets Wrap
February Jobs Report a Final Hurdle for Fed's Next Rate Rise
What Comes Next as May Prepares to Trigger Brexit: QuickTake Q&A
Oil Traders Are Having Some Fun Again as Price Bubble Bursts
Ousting the president won't fix South Korea's economy
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts
