Briefly: In our opinion, no speculative positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view. We will likely have another trading opportunity shortly – likely this week, perhaps later today.
The situation in the precious metals sector is very tense – metals and miners are after both big rallies and invalidations of breakouts – which of them will continue in a sustained movement?
In yesterday’s alert, we wrote the following:
Why could it be the case that we will get better prices tomorrow? Because tomorrow we’ll get the Fed’s latest comments and in the previous cases precious metals rallied ahead of such comments.
Tomorrow’s comments might be particularly interesting as this will be the chance for Janet Yellen to comment on the NIRP issue that the market likely overreacted to (Yellen only said that they can’t / don’t rule it out, which is inconsequential but the markets viewed it as meaningful – she couldn’t have said anything else regardless of the situation). If the effect of the NIRP comments was unplanned, it’s quite likely that tomorrow’s comments will aim to somehow reverse it. The previous comments turned out to be very bullish for gold (in fact, if it hadn’t been for these comments, we think the rally would have been over weeks ago), so tomorrow’s comments could be bearish.
Naturally, we can’t know what Janet Yellen will say, but the above appears to be the likely outcome. This fits very well into the technical picture described earlier in today’s alert. Gold, silver and miners could rally early tomorrow only to slide lower before the session is over. Of course we’ll have to wait and see how today’s session turns out and what happens in tomorrow’s pre-market trading in order to determine if the above is still likely to happen tomorrow, but at this time, it seems quite probable.
Please note that based on today’s closing prices it’s not possible to say exactly what the entry prices would be for tomorrow’s trade – if that is possible tomorrow morning, we’ll let you know. If not – we’ll send out another update intra-day (tomorrow).
Unfortunately, yesterday’s closing prices and today’s price action don’t say much. Let’s take a closer look at the charts, starting with gold (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).
In yesterday’s alert we wrote the following:
Did gold break below the key support levels yesterday? Through some – yes, through most of them including the rising support line – not yet. Consequently, the short-term outlook deteriorated only a little.
We can say the same today, based on yesterday’s closing prices – gold didn’t break below the rising support line, so the short-term outlook deteriorated only a little.
We also wrote the following:
Silver declined a little yesterday, but it’s more important that it initially rallied higher only to plunge later during the session. This kind of reversal could be a confirmation that the top is already in, especially that silver is just before its cyclical turning point, but it could also be the case that silver gives us one more quick and sharp rally before the big turnaround. All in all, the situation in silver deteriorated yesterday, but only a little.
Again, silver moved just a little lower, so it could be that it rallies higher shortly and tops right at the cyclical turning point. The outlook didn’t really change.
Moreover, we wrote the following:
On a short-term basis, we see that mining stocks are not only clearly below the rising support line once again, but that they also declined after the breakdown and it took place on big volume (especially on a relative basis).
That’s a bearish sign for the short-term, however, let’s keep in mind that the bearish price-volume link (higher volume during daily downswings than during daily upswings) has been present in the mining stocks for a few weeks and it didn’t result in immediately lower prices, so it may not result in an immediate drop also this time. It simply tells us that the next big move is most likely to be to the downside and that it’s likely that miners won’t move much higher before reversing and sliding once again.
In a way, the January – March upswing is self-similar to the October 2015 rally (with the more recent rally being proportionally bigger). Back in October 2015 the time that it took for mining stocks to consolidate before erasing the previous gains was more or less equal to the time in which the rally unfolded (to the first top). If we apply the same also this time, it appears possible and likely that we will see more sideways trading before the next big slide is really seen.
The reason that we are mentioning this is not to say that the decline won’t start anytime soon – the reason that we are mentioning this is to say that it’s quite likely the case that we will get a better shorting opportunity than what we have right now.
We once again saw a move higher on low volume, which is a bearish sign, but still that was a move higher in mining stocks despite a move lower in gold, which can be viewed as bullish. Overall, the implications of yesterday’s session are mixed.
Summing up, we haven’t seen enough confirmations to say that a short position at this time would be justified, but it appears (mostly based on reasons discussed yesterday) that we will have a good shorting opportunity relatively soon. It’s quite likely that the market will move higher before today’s comments from the Fed and this could (! – but doesn’t have to be) a good moment to enter short positions in gold, silver and mining stocks. We will likely send out another alert later today once we get (or we don’t get them) a move higher and some bearish confirmations.
As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – updated.
To summarize:
Trading capital (our opinion): No positions
Long-term capital (our opinion): No positions
Insurance capital (our opinion): Full position
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the sings pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.
The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
Yesterday, the Bank of Japan kept its monetary policy steady. What does it imply for the gold market?
Earlier today, the Bank of Japan kept interest rates unchanged at -0.10% which pushed the yen higher against the greenback. What does it mean for USD/JPY?
Forex Trading Alert: USD/JPY – Short-term Consequences of Long-Term Resistance
We saw not much action over the weekend and in the preceding days. Bitcoin might seem boring now, but this is actually quite far from our take on the currency.
Bitcoin Trading Alert: Bitcoin Not Far from $400
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
PRECIOUS-Gold edges lower ahead of Fed policy statement
Kazakhstan & China Join Forces In Gold Market
LAWRIE WILLIAMS: Tense time for gold bulls
WHO gathers hair to probe uranium from Johannesburg gold mines
=====
In other news:
Fed seen holding rates steady as it faces fine balancing act
'Risks rising' across Saudi Arabia's banking system
OPEC, non-OPEC producers to meet in April: Qatari minister
London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Boerse Agree on Merger
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts
