Briefly: Short positions (full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective.
Just when gold seemed to be rallying strongly and invalidating the breakdown below the short-term support line, it wiped out the entire daily rally and closed lower than on the previous day. What can we infer from this disappointing action?
In short, we can infer that the bearish outlook remains in place and the recent attempts to invalidate the previous breakdown failed. Let’s take a closer look (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).
Earlier this week, we wrote that the Stockcharts’ data provider could be providing incorrect values of gold and it seems to continue as yesterday’s closing price reported by other sources (like kitco.com and gold-eagle.com) is about $1,338 – over $10 below the price reported on the above chart. With this in mind, we can clearly say that the breakdown below the rising support line was not invalidated. Actually, the breakdown was confirmed.
In the case of the mining stocks, we also saw a daily reversal, but the volume was not huge, so it’s not a major bearish confirmation yet. Still, miners are in a rising wedge pattern that is about to end, and this is generally a bearish reversal pattern. Naturally, the implications thereof are bearish.
Summing up, the analogy to the 1983 decline remains in place and so do many bearish signals discussed on Monday, and yesterday’s reversal and confirmation of the breakdown in gold confirm the bearish outlook.
As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – updated.
To summarize:
Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Short positions (full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following entry prices, stop-loss orders and initial target price levels:
- Gold: initial target price: $1,006; stop-loss: $1,423, initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $74.37; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $34.91
- Silver: initial target price: $13.12; stop-loss: $21.63, initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $39.78; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $14.34
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $9.34; stop-loss: $33.17, initial target price for the DUST ETF: $16.38; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $3.77
In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $14.13; stop-loss: $54.29
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $14.39; stop-loss: $3.22
Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions
Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.
The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
The winners of the LBMA’s 2015 Annual Forecast Survey have recently updated their 2016 forecasts for the precious metals prices. What do they expect now?
LBMA Updates Gold 2016 Forecasts
Do you want to know what are the UK’s options outside the European Union? We invite you to read our today’s article presenting what future EU-UK relations would look like in case the Brexit really happens and find out their impact on the gold market.
What Would Future EU-UK Relations Look Like?
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
Gold’s Rally Losing Steam as Stocks Climb and Dollar Strengthens
Why Indians and Chinese buying less gold this year
UAE gold jewellery demand falls 26% due to high prices and oil rout
Goldman Sachs is squaring up against JPMorgan and HSBC to decide the future of gold trading
South Africa output topples platinum, palladium prices
Here is why these mining and metals companies left the TSX
=====
In other news:
Dollar firm after Fed president's comments; U.S. data in focus
No sign of comedown for stocks after Wall Street record highs
Pound Reclaims World’s-Worst Crown as BOE Stimulus Kicks In
Negative Rates for the People Arrive as German Bank Gives In
China has started bailing out its banks, UBS says
Wall Street Can’t Agree on When to Halt the U.S. Stock Market
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts