Gold & Silver Trading Alert: Small, but Important Changes

tools spotlight

Briefly: In our opinion, full (150% of the regular full position) speculative short positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective. This position was originally featured on Jan. 12, 2017 at 3:49PM.

Today’s alert is going to be short as generally nothing happened in the case of gold, silver and mining stocks yesterday and the same goes for today’s pre-market trading. Consequently, everything that we wrote yesterday remains up-to-date.

One thing that we would like to add, though, is that the USD Index moved even closer to the previous lows (December 2016 and February 2017) and at the same time it moved one day closer to the 3-month milestone that we discussed yesterday. In other words, the current situation reflects what happened in early 2003 to an even greater degree. This means that the reversal (for the USD Index, which is likely to translate into a reversal in gold and silver) is likely even closer.

We’ve been asked if - in light of the situation being even more similar to what happened in 2003 than it was at the February bottom - it’s a good idea to increase the size of the current position even further. In short, we don’t think so - taking on additional risk by increasing the initial size of the position is one thing, but making a speculative position very huge is something different. Our research shows that keeping the speculative positions small is what allows one to grow capital over time, while big positions don’t tend to have the same effect.

It’s different in the case of long-term investments, where the probability of being correct increases (there are more factors that one can analyze in order to gain the edge), which is why long-term investment capital is generally much bigger than the size of the speculative trades (and why investment decisions are much more important than speculative ones). Long story short, it seems that the already-increased size of the speculative position is enough for the current risk to reward ratio. Please keep in mind that we are already “using” the long-term investment capital for the “bet” on lower precious metals prices, by staying out of the market with this part of the portfolio.

Summing up, this week’s price swings, just as last week’s price developments, have changed much less than it appears at the first sight – the long-term sell signals remain in place and the USD Index is even more likely to start its huge rally shortly than was the case back in early February due to the similarity between the early 2003 consolidation and the current one (with the emphasis on the time factor).

As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – informed.

To summarize:

Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Short positions (150% of the full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial target price levels / profit-take orders:

Gold: exit-profit-take level: $1,063; stop-loss: $1,273; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $81.88; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $48.17
Silver: initial target price: $13.12; stop-loss: $18.67; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $46.18; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $19.87
Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $9.34; stop-loss: $26.34; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $143.56; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $21.37

In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:

GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $14.13; stop-loss: $45.31
JDST ETF: initial target price: $104.26; stop-loss: $10.78

Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)

Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position

Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).

Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.

Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.

As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.

Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.

Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.

As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.

The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.

As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.

=====

Latest Free Trading Alerts:

American stocks fell more than 1 percent on Tuesday. What does it mean for the gold market?

Waning Trump’s Rally and Gold

S&P 500 index gained 0.2% on Wednesday, as it retraced some of its Tuesday's sell-off. Is this an upward reversal or just upward correction within a new downtrend? Is holding short position still justified?

Stock Trading Alert: Upward Reversal Or Just Quick Rebound Before Another Leg Down?

=====

Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:

Gold below 3-week peak as dollar recovers; Trump policy in focus

Silver Wheaton may soon be named Wheaton Precious Metals

=====

In other news:

The Many Culprits in Tuesday's Market Selloff

GOP health bill on the brink hours from House showdown vote

Greek Deposits Bleeding Drama Resumes Amid Bailout Uncertainty

Banks Take $252 Billion Free ECB Cash With QE Exit in Mind

=====