Briefly: In our opinion, short (full) speculative positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view.

Gold moved higher yesterday and mining stocks outperformed once again. The USD Index didn’t plunge, so the above seems to have bullish implications – but does it really?

Not likely. There was a good reason for gold to rally yesterday – quoting today’s Gold News Monitor:

Turkey said that it had shot down  Russian fighter jet near the Syrian border after it had violated its airspace. (…) the shooting down was the most serious publicly acknowledged clash between a NATO member country and Russia for half a century.

Gold had a good reason to rally and yet, in managed to close only $6.70 higher.

Let’s take a look at the charts (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).

The mentioned small rally took place on relatively low volume, so it seems that the gold market is not strong enough to rally even given the bullish news. Therefore, the implications are bearish.

As you can see above, nothing changed in the silver market, and the implications are bearish as silver is after 2 weekly closes below the previous lowest close of the year.

From the long-term perspective, nothing important happened in gold stocks – the decline continues at its previous pace. Moreover, the sell signal from the Stochastic indicator remains in play and continues to have bearish implications for the following weeks.

Mining stocks moved higher on volume that seems to be big on a relative basis, but only because Monday’s volume was so tiny. If we compare yesterday’s volume to the Friday’s value, we will see that it was actually lower. Therefore, we don’t think that yesterday’s strength in miners is really meaningful. If it wasn’t for the mentioned geopolitical event, it could be significant, but in light of what happened, it’s not.

Summing up, it seems that gold’s move higher yesterday was just a temporary event-driven phenomenon and that once the geopolitical situation stabilizes a bit, the prices of metals and miners will slide.

While we can’t rule out another corrective upswing in the coming days (based on what we have seen this week, it seems that there approximately is a 25% probability of seeing a corrective upswing shortly), but if we see it, it seems unlikely that gold would move above $1,100 or so. It’s more likely that the profits from the current short position will become even bigger in the coming days and weeks.

As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – updated.

To summarize:

Trading capital (our opinion): Short position (full) position in gold, silver and mining stocks is justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial (! – this means that reaching them doesn’t automatically close the position) target prices:

• Gold: initial target price: $1,012; stop-loss: $1,103, initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $109.27; stop loss for the DGLD ETN $85.51
• Silver: initial target price: $12.60; stop-loss: $14.73, initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $96.67; stop loss for DSLV ETN $61.00
• Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $11.57; stop-loss: $14.73, initial target price for the DUST ETF: $26.61; stop loss for the DUST ETF $15.49

In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:

• GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $16.27; stop-loss: $20.73
• JDST ETF: initial target price: $46.47; stop-loss: $26.04

Long-term capital (our opinion): No positions

Insurance capital (our opinion): Full position

Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.

Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.

As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.

Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the sings pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.

Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.

As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.

The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.

As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.

=====

Latest Free Trading Alerts:

Turkey Downs Russian Jet. Will Gold Rise?

Yesterday, Turkey shot down a Russian warplane. What does it mean for the gold market?

Forex Trading Alert: USD/CHF – Resistance Area Continues to Keep Gains in Check

Although yesterday’s data showed that existing home sales dropped by 3.4% to 5.36 million units in Oct (missing analysts’ forecasts for a 2.3% fall), demand for the greenback continued to be supported by expectations that the Fed would raise interest rates next month. Thanks to these circumstances, USD/CHF hit a fresh Nov high and approached the Jan high. Will this resistance encourage currency bears to act in the coming days?

=====

Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:

Gold prices could see 'significant downside': Technician

The case for why gold may finally be nearing a bottom

=====

In other news:

Paris attacks: Belgium launches hunt for new suspect

Ukraine closes airspace to all Russian planes

=====

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief

Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts