Briefly: In our opinion, long (full) speculative positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view.

In the first part of yesterday’s session gold, silver and mining stocks moved lower and just when most traders thought that Monday’s move higher was a one-day event, PMs reversed and ended the session higher once again. Will the rally continue for much longer?

Our reply to the above question depends on how one defines “much”. We think that the rally is not over, but we don’t expect it to continue for many tens of dollars in the case of gold. Let’s take a look at the charts (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).

Let’s start by saying that our yesterday’s comments on gold remain up-to-date:

Gold rallied quite visibly yesterday and it finally closed below the July 20 close – something that they yellow metal didn’t manage to do since that day. There was no move back above the 3 declining resistance lines, but the size of the volume during the upswing makes the above chart more bullish than it was previously.

Another thing that has bullish implications (but not extremely bullish) is the RSI indicator. As you can see in the upper part of the above chart, when the RSI (and gold) moved higher from oversold levels, the rally very often took place until RSI moved to the 50 - 60 range (marked with dashed lines on the above chart). This tells us that gold is likely to move somewhat higher but not significantly (at least that’s not what we can infer from the previous oversold situations).

Considering how low the RSI was, where it is today, and how high it could go, and translating it to where gold was and currently is gives us a very rough estimation of $1,125 – 1,145 as a target price. Naturally, the RSI alone is not enough to provide a reliable target price or area.

However, if we apply other analogies, we also end up with more or less the same target area.

The 50-day moving average is currently at $1,147.15, but given the pace at which it has been declining, it seems likely that it could meet gold right in the mentioned target area.

Moreover, this area includes the Nov. 2014 low, which was a major support and now serves as a major resistance.

Finally, if we consider the sizes of corrective upswings after situations when the RSI was similarly oversold as it has been recently, we see that gold usually corrected between 38.2% and 61.8% of the preceding decline (or close to these levels). The mentioned area is mostly within the 38.2% - 61.8% range, which serves as another confirmation that this target area is likely to include the next local top.

Gold moved above the mentioned 3 declining support/resistance lines, and ended the session at the highest one and above the 2 other ones. With 3 out of 4 breakdowns being invalidated, the situation clearly improved once again yesterday.

The situation in silver didn’t really improve, but it was already bullish, so we can quote our yesterday’s comments as they correctly describe also the current situation:

Is the breakout meaningful? Actually, it likely is. It doesn’t necessarily imply that silver will soar much (several dollars) further, but it does tell us that silver’s rally is likely not over just yet. The reason is silver’s performance after similar price moves and breakouts. As you can see on the above chart, silver tends to continue to rally for a short period and then tops after such breakouts.

How high is silver likely to go?

Higher, but not much higher. There is significant long-term resistance relatively close to where silver currently is. The declining dashed resistance line and the 50-week moving average provide resistance close to the $16 level. It’s unclear whether silver’s next local top is more likely to take place a bit below or above this level, but it seems likely that we will get confirmation from another market (gold or mining stocks) once silver moves close to this area.

The action seen in mining stocks is once again bullish as well as miners simply moved higher.

In the previous alerts we wrote the following:

Miners didn’t plunge and they indeed formed a bullish reversal candlestick. This has bullish implications for the next few weeks, and we can say the same about the buy signal from the weekly Stochastic indicator.

The bullish signal was indeed followed by more bullish action and this week’s invalidation of the breakdown below the 2003 low is yet another bullish factor. The situation improved and our target area (marked with green) remains up-to-date.

Yesterday’s rally serves as another confirmation of the mentioned bullish case for the short term.

We commented on the above chart in the following way yesterday:

The situation improved significantly on Monday from the short-term perspective as the GDX rallied on strong volume by more than 6%. Our target area (marked in green) remains up-to-date also on the above chart. It seems that the GDX will move to the $15 - $16 range before topping once again.

The situation improved once again yesterday. In fact, the early corrective intra-day decline served as a very small consolidation and it made the subsequent gains more probable. The short-term outlook remains bullish and our target area remains up-to-date.

Since the situation improved slightly, but the implications and outlook remain as they were yesterday, we can summarize today’s alert just as we summarized yesterday’s issue:

Summing up, Summing up, from the medium-term perspective nothing changed in the precious metals market recently as the situation was and still is bearish (we don’t think the final bottom for this decline is in yet), but it seems very likely that we will see a corrective rally before the decline continues (and we continue to think that taking profits off the table and closing our previous short position when silver moved to $14.33 was a good idea).

There are more bullish factors than bearish ones (the bearishness in the mainstream media being the most significant bullish factor), and the situation has actually become much more bullish because of yesterday’s price-volume action. The outlook improved in the case of gold and it improved significantly in the case of silver and mining stocks and since the entire PM sector is likely to move in the same direction in the short term, we believe that it’s currently justified from the risk/reward perspective to keep the full size of the profitable speculative long position in the precious metals sector. It seems quite likely that our profits on this trade will become even bigger.

We will keep you – our subscribers – updated.

To summarize:

Trading capital (our opinion): Long position (full) position in gold, silver and mining stocks is justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial (! – this means that reaching them doesn’t automatically close the position) target prices:

• Gold: initial target price: $1,130; stop-loss: $1,063, initial target price for the UGLD ETN: $9.24; stop loss for the UGLD ETN $7.69
• Silver: initial target price: $15.90; stop-loss: $14.12, initial target price for the USLV ETN: $16.54; stop loss for USLV ETN $11.51
• Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETN): initial target price: $15.87; stop-loss: $12.37, initial target price for the NUGT ETN: $5.17; stop loss for the NUGT ETN $2.46

In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:

• GDXJ: initial target price: $21.78; stop-loss: $17.67
• JNUG: initial target price: $12.01; stop-loss: $6.39

Long-term capital (our opinion): No positions

Insurance capital (our opinion): Full position

Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.

As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.

Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the sings pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.

Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.

As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.

The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.

As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.

=====

Latest Free Trading Alerts:

Yesterday, China’s central bank devalued the yuan by a 1.9 percent, and today it further cut the reference rate by 1.6 percent. What does it mean for the global economy and the gold market?

China Devalues Yuan for Second Day

=====

Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:

Ravaged by Oil's Collapse, Venezuela Now Has a Big Gold Problem

CREDIT SUISSE: The days of gold being a 'safe haven' may be over

Barclays: 'There Are Limited Signs of Safe-Haven Demand for Gold'

=====

In other news:

IMF: China's currency reforms are a good thing

US Dollar Forecast to Rise 20 pct in Next 3 Years

Greece's Preliminary Bailout Deal Faces German Turbulence

Moody's cuts Brazil rating but says investment grade is safe

=====

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief

Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts