Briefly: in our opinion, full (250% of the regular size of the position) speculative short positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective at the moment of publishing this alert.
Today’s Alert is going to be short as we have very little to comment on. There was some intraday volatility before the interest rate decision, and after it was all said and done, the prices seemed to have moved back into their respective trends. At least that was the case with the precious metals market, which moved lower.
The decline in gold and silver was not spectacular yet, but – as we explained on Tuesday – it’s not something that should make one calm, because a pause was exactly what preceded the $200+ decline in 2013 and the current decline shares multiple similarities with the 2013 one.
The only thing that we would like to emphasize was that the mining stocks declined in a quite profound manner.
That’s important, because miners previously seemed to be showing strength. We emphasized that this is likely just a temporary development that’s a result of a technical verification of strong declines in the gold-stock-related ratios.
In case of the ratio between gold stocks and other stocks, it was even a verification of the breakdown below the 2015 lows.
Yesterday’s strong decline is important, as it provides a confirmation of what we wrote. The corrective upswing in the precious metals sector and in the above-mentioned ratios appears to be over and lower precious metals and mining stock values are now likely to be seen.
And that’s practically the only thing that changed based on yesterday’s session. Everything else that we wrote in the last few Alerts remains up-to-date. We don’t want to quote them in their entirety here, as it will be easier to read if you go over these Alerts directly.
Also, since we didn’t have a lot to report on today, and thus there was not that much to read in today’s analysis, it may be a good idea to catch up on what we posted previously, if you haven’t had the chance to do so. We particularly encourage you to make sure that you didn’t miss the following essays:
- Dear Gold Investor - Letters from 2013 - Analogy to 2013, which should make it easier to trade the upcoming sizable upswing (if enough factors point to it, that is) and to enter the market close to the final bottom.
- Gold to Soar Above $6,000 - discussion of gold’s long-term upside target of $6,000.
- Preparing for THE Bottom in Gold: Part 6 – What to Buy - extremely important analysis of the portfolio structure for the next huge, multi-year rally in the precious metals.
- Preparing for THE Bottom in Gold: Part 7 – Buy-and-hold on Steroids - description of a strategy dedicated to significantly boosting one’s long-term investment returns while staying invested in the PM sector.
- Gold’s Downside Target, Upcoming Rebound, and Miners’ Buy Plan - details regarding the shape of the following price moves, a buying plan for mining stocks, and a brief discussion of the final price targets for the current decline.
- Gold: What Happened vs. What Changed - discussion of the latest extreme readings from gold’s CoT report
- Key Factors for Gold & Silver Investors - discussion of key, long-term factors that support the bearish outlook for PMs. We are often asked what makes us so bearish – this article is a reply to this question.
- The Upcoming Silver Surprise - two sets of price targets for gold, silver and mining stocks: the initial and the final one.
- Precious Metals Sector: It’s 2013 All Over Again - comparison between 2013 and 2018 throughout the precious metals sector, the general stock market and the USD Index. Multiple similarities point to the repeat of a 2013-style volatile decline in the PMs.
Summary
Summing up, it seems that the next big downswing in the precious metals sector is already underway. We saw the repeat of mining stocks’ bearish shooting star candlestick, we also saw a very short-term outperformance of silver, and – yesterday – we saw the comeback of mining stocks’ underperformance. Not to mention the multiple signs that have been pointing to the lower PM prices in the following weeks for a long time. All in all, it seems that the huge profits on our short positions will soon become enormous.
As always, we’ll keep you – our subscribers – informed.
To summarize:
Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full short positions (250% of the full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and exit profit-take price levels:
- Gold: profit-take exit price: $1,062; stop-loss: $1,226; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $82.96; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $53.67
- Silver: profit-take exit price: $12.72; stop-loss: $15.16; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $46.97; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $31.37
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): profit-take exit price: $13.12; stop-loss: $19.61; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $80.97; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $33.37
Note: the above is a specific preparation for a possible sudden price drop, it does not reflect the most likely outcome. You will find a more detailed explanation in our August 1 Alert. In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks’ prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: profit-take exit price: $17.52; stop-loss: $29.43
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $154.97 stop-loss: $64.88
Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)
Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position
Important Details for New Subscribers
Whether you already subscribed or not, we encourage you to find out how to make the most of our alerts and read our replies to the most common alert-and-gold-trading-related-questions.
Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
Powell and Co. hiked again. And the FOMC removed the important phrase about “accommodative” stance. What now for gold?
Fed Tightening Cycles: Broader View and Implications for Gold
Stocks reversed their yesterday's intraday uptrend following the Fed's Rate Decision release. Will they continue lower today? Or was it just a quick downward correction before another leg up?
Fed Hikes, Stocks Fall, Just Correction?
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts
