Briefly: in our opinion, full (300% of the regular position size) speculative short positions in mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view at the moment of publishing this Alert.
Quite a few things happened since we wrote yesterday's analysis, but three of them seem to matter the most and that's what we'll focus on in today's Alert.
The first and foremost - gold futures just moved to a new 2020 high. The previous high was $1788.80 and it was formed on April 14th. Gold moved to $1,791.55 and it happened during the overnight trading. It managed to stay above the April 14th high for full 16 minutes before moving back below it. It made another attempt within the next hour, but this attempt also failed relatively quickly.
Gold's quick invalidations instead of a sharp rally after the breakout don't have bullish implications, but bearish ones. This is especially the case since gold's very long-term turning point is right about now. Forming a local top, right below the yearly high is profound, but making a tiny new high and then invalidating it practically right at the turning point is making the indication quite extreme.
The second thing is that while gold moved much higher yesterday, miners didn't.
While gold moved visibly higher yesterday, miners were unable to repeat its strength. Indeed, they closed higher, but they already invalidated a tiny breakout of their own. The GDX ETF attempted to move above the June 1st high, but ultimately failed to do so, finishing 1 cent below the June 1 close.
While gold was moving up, miners were almost forced to move up as well, but their inability to move up in a strong manner is a clear sign that this is not the direction the market really wants to go. It's therefore patiently waiting for the signals or news that will cause the first wave of selling. Given favorable technicals, the first wave of selling would likely be followed by even more selling, and since the situation now is relatively similar (pandemic-wise) to what we had in March, the selling could take form of a waterfall.
The third thing is the possible signal that might have just arrived from the crude oil market. In yesterday's analysis, we wrote that the reversal in black gold and a decisive decline could be the thing that tips the scale for all markets. And indeed, crude oil is about a dollar lower than it was yesterday, when we wrote about oil's bearish indications. It didn't manage to close above the upper border of the March price gap, which means that this resistance remains intact. This (at first sight - small) event might have marked the turnaround in many markets. That's something that perfectly fits the invalidation of gold's small breakout as well as its long-term turning point.
Summary
Summing up, the outlook for the precious metals market is extremely bearish for the next 1-3 weeks due to the huge number of bearish signs (and their strength) that we have right now, and how likely PMs are to repeat their March slide to a significant extent). The sharply rising new Covid-19 cases numbers as well as gold's long-term cyclical turning point both suggest that gold's one final slide is just around the corner.
Crude oil reaching its resistance could be the tipping point not just for that market, but for many other markets - after all, the oil price decline heralded the same move for other markets also in March and pandemic-wise the situation is now very similar.
After the sell-off (that takes gold below $1,400), we expect the precious metals to rally significantly. The final decline might take as little as 1-3 weeks, so it's important to stay alert to any changes. In particular, please note that there might be a time to move from mining stocks to silver as the latter tends to catch up in the final part of a given move - also during declines.
Most importantly - stay healthy and safe. We made a lot of money on the March decline and the subsequent rebound (its initial part) price moves (and we'll likely make much more in the following weeks and months), but you have to be healthy to really enjoy the results.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - informed.
To summarize:
Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full speculative short positions (300% of the full position) in mining stocks is justified from the risk to reward point of view with the following binding exit profit-take price levels:
Senior mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): binding profit-take exit price: $10.32; stop-loss: none (the volatility is too big to justify a SL order in case of this particular trade); binding profit-take level for the DUST ETF: $231.75; stop-loss for the DUST ETF: none (the volatility is too big to justify a SL order in case of this particular trade)
Junior mining stocks (price levels for the GDXJ ETF): binding profit-take exit price: $9.57; stop-loss: none (the volatility is too big to justify a SL order in case of this particular trade); binding profit-take level for the JDST ETF: $284.25; stop-loss for the JDST ETF: none (the volatility is too big to justify a SL order in case of this particular trade)
For-your-information targets (our opinion; we continue to think that mining stocks are the preferred way of taking advantage of the upcoming price move, but if for whatever reason one wants / has to use silver or gold for this trade, we are providing the details anyway. In our view, silver has greater potential than gold does):
Silver futures downside profit-take exit price: $8.58 (the downside potential for silver is significant, but likely not as big as the one in the mining stocks)
Gold futures downside profit-take exit price: $1,382 (the target for gold is least clear; it might drop to even $1,170 or so; the downside potential for gold is significant, but likely not as big as the one in the mining stocks or silver)
Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash
Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position
Whether you already subscribed or not, we encourage you to find out how to make the most of our alerts and read our replies to the most common alert-and-gold-trading-related-questions.
Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn't mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder - "initial target price" means exactly that - an "initial" one, it's not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we've done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not "initial", but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks - the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as "final". This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the "additional instruments" (DGLD for instance), but not for the "main instrument" (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn't, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it's not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can't provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the "additional instruments" without adjusting the levels in the "main instruments", which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
