Briefly: in our opinion, full (250% of the regular size of the position) speculative short positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective at the moment of publishing this alert.
After several days of lower prices, the precious metals sector moved visibly higher yesterday. The rally was particularly visible in case of the mining stocks. Since the latter is the part of the PM sector that often leads the rest, is it the case that we have just seen an important short-term bottom?
It’s possible, but it’s not likely. If it is indeed a bottom, and not a pause, then it’s most likely not going to trigger an important upswing but a medium one at best. The reason is that yesterday’s upswing didn’t really change anything from the technical point of view. Let’s take a look at the details.
Precious Metals’ Corrective Upswing
Gold moved only a bit higher and it did so on volume that was not higher than the volume that accompanied the preceding decline. The price levels that gold reached were also quite specific. Gold moved to the previous bottom and then declined once again, finally closing yesterday’s session below its 50-day moving average. It’s simply seems to be a pause within a downtrend.
Why did gold move higher at all? Most likely because it moved to the rising dashed support line that is based on the August and October intraday lows. But, just like the late-May upswing didn’t change anything with regard to the trend, the current move higher is also unlikely to change anything, even given the buy signal from the daily Stochastic indicator. We saw analogous signals in May (twice), June, and July and they were followed by only brief consolidations after which the decline continued.
Silver moved $0.10 higher after touching the declining red support line, but it didn’t manage to close above the previous 2018 low. This was the third consecutive close below this level and thus the breakdown was just confirmed. The implications are very bearish.
If gold moves a bit higher from here ($5 - $20), silver would be likely to move a bit higher as well, but such moves would be very unlikely to really change anything regarding the trend.
In case of the gold stocks, we see that yesterday’s strength caused an invalidation of the head-and-shoulders pattern in intraday terms, but it didn’t invalidate it in terms of the daily closing prices.
Mining Stocks – Confirmation vs. Invalidation of the H&S Pattern
It was also not invalidated in case of the GDX ETF, so overall, we don’t view it as invalidated and thus the short-term outlook didn’t change. It remains bearish.
However, if the underlying metals rally (not significantly, but still), the formation could become invalidated and then the rally could become more significant. But, even if it does, we don’t expect the miners to move above their previous November highs (precisely, above the right shoulder of the head-and-shoulders formation that's at about $19.75).
Please note that the next cyclical turning point is just around the corner – precisely on Thanksgiving. Since it’s not a trading day in the US, the implications could come into effect right before Thanksgiving or shortly thereafter. This means that whatever rally we see here, it’s likely limited to about one week.
As far as the USD Index is concerned, we saw an invalidation of the tiny breakout above the medium-term inverse head-and-shoulders pattern, which could trigger some short-term weakness. But, such weakness is not likely to be very significant.
The USD Index is following the reflective pattern, in which the 2018 rally is a reflection of the 2017-2018 decline. The current situation seems to be similar to what happened in early August 2017. Back then we saw a zigzag, so perhaps we’ll see some king of zigzag here as well. Back then the zigzag had higher highs and higher lows, which suggests that it now should have lower highs and lower lows. Then again, the symmetry is not direct as the medium-term highs are and lows are now higher (August 2018 high is higher than the November 2017 high), which could distort the direct zigzag analogy.
All in all, it seems that the USD Index could decline to the November low at most and quite likely not lower than to the 96 level. That’s where we have the neckline of the local inverse head-and-shoulders pattern and the 50% Fibonacci retracement level based on the previous medium-term decline. The downside seems quite limited.
Summary
Summing up, the outlook remains strongly bearish for the precious metals sector and there are increasingly more signals that confirm it. There is a huge opportunity in taking advantage of the upcoming slide and then taking on big positions close to the final bottom, when others will be too scared to do so. It seems that another big decline in gold, silver and mining stocks has already begun and that the huge profits on our short positions will become enormous shortly. We may, however, get a one final very short-term (weekly) upswing in the PM and mining stock prices before the big plunge. The key word here is “may” – the big plunge could take place any day, so we are not adjusting our positions based on the above possibility. The risk to reward ratio continues to favor short positions in gold, silver, and mining stocks because of all the long-term factors that remain in place and that we discussed recently. Also, if you haven’t had the chance to read yesterday’s analysis where we discuss some of the long-term factors (and your Editor discusses his why), we strongly encourage you to read it today.
As always, we’ll keep you – our subscribers – informed.
To summarize:
Trading capital (supplementary part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full short positions (250% of the full position) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and exit profit-take price levels:
- Gold: profit-take exit price: $1,062; stop-loss: $1,257; initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $82.96; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $49.27
- Silver: profit-take exit price: $12.32; stop-loss: $15.11; initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $47.67; stop-loss for the DSLV ETN $28.37
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): profit-take exit price: $13.12; stop-loss: $20.83; initial target price for the DUST ETF: $80.97; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $27.67
Note: the above is a specific preparation for a possible sudden price drop, it does not reflect the most likely outcome. You will find a more detailed explanation in our August 1 Alert. In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks’ prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: profit-take exit price: $17.52; stop-loss: $31.23
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $154.97 stop-loss: $51.78
Long-term capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): No positions (in other words: cash)
Insurance capital (core part of the portfolio; our opinion): Full position
Important Details for New Subscribers
Whether you already subscribed or not, we encourage you to find out how to make the most of our alerts and read our replies to the most common alert-and-gold-trading-related-questions.
Please note that the in the trading section we describe the situation for the day that the alert is posted. In other words, it we are writing about a speculative position, it means that it is up-to-date on the day it was posted. We are also featuring the initial target prices, so that you can decide whether keeping a position on a given day is something that is in tune with your approach (some moves are too small for medium-term traders and some might appear too big for day-traders).
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the signs pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
Stocks extended their short-term downtrend on Wednesday, as investors' sentiment remained bearish following last week's downward reversal off the resistance level. We saw a quick intraday downward reversal yesterday. So will the market break below 2,700 mark?
S&P 500 at 2,700 Again, Will Downtrend Continue?
China has developed tremendously in recent years. But what’s next? Is the country entering the growth recession? And how it will affect the world and the gold market?
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
PRECIOUS-Gold holds ground as dollar gains on Brexit turmoil
Paulson & Co keeps stake in gold investments during third-quarter: filing
European Commission publishes list of exempt investment gold coins for 2019
=====
In other news:
Powell Says Solid Economy Faces Headwinds as Fed Mulls Rates
Pound Falls Most Since 2017 as May's Brexit Divorce Plan Rocked
British PM May battles to save Brexit deal as ministers quit
UK inflation steady at 2.4% in October after food price war
Bitcoin market cap falls below $100 billion for first time since October 2017
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Editor-in-chief, Gold & Silver Fund Manager
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts